HST Extinguishment Act for the Citizen’s Initiative against the #HST in BC
Dec 10, 2009 Details
Posted by
admin
Title:
HST Extinguishment Act
Preamble:
Whereas a Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) combining the Provincial Sales Tax (PST) with the federal
Goods and Services Tax (GST) as contemplated by the Governments of British Columbia and Canada
contravenes Section 92, Article 2, of the Constitution Act 1867, which states:
92. In each Province the Legislature may exclusively make Laws in relation to Matters coming within the
Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say,
2. Direct Taxation within the Province in order to the raising of a Revenue for Provincial Purposes.
And whereas the people of British Columbia, as expressed in the Citizen Initiative Petition against the
Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) in British Columbia, wish to extinguish the tax, therefore;
Part I
(1) The HST is extinguished in British Columbia.
(2) Any Agreement(s) between The Government of British Columbia and The Government of
Canada establishing an HST in British Columbia are hereby extinguished and of no force or effect
whatsoever.
(3) Any Legislation by The Government of British Columbia establishing an HST is hereby
extinguished and of no force or effect whatsoever.
(4) Any Legislation by The Government of Canada establishing an HST in British Columbia is of
no force or affect in British Columbia whatsoever.
Part II
(1) A Provincial Sales Tax (PST) of 7% with the same applications and exemptions as at June
30th 2010 shall be the only sales tax in British Columbia for the raising of a Revenue for Provincial
Purposes.
Part III
(1) This Act shall be effective as of June 30th 2010.
Tags: article 2 of the constitution, citizen initiative, constitution act 1867, contravenes, goods and services tax, government of british columbia, government of canada, governments, harmonized sales tax, initiative petition, legislation, preamble, provincial sales tax, sales tax, taxation
December 14th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Nice web site.
Nice to see people using the Constitution to kick ass. That’s the way to do it, people!
May I remind you of s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, which renders VOID any and all unconstitutional action.
VOID action is retroactively void in Canadian law, although it is presumed valid until declared void by a competent court.
Get the biographies of your local Section 96 judges, make sure none of them is a globalist, or worked for NAFTA, or supported the 1980 and 1995 Quebec referendums (all frauds).
Also check out your Chief Justice, and be sure you don’t pick a judge under the wrong thumb.
Bring your case to a section 96 judge you are fairly sure you won’t have grounds to recuse, and do this YOURSELVES. Go in and JUDICIALLY NULLIFY the agreement.
For a more complete meaning of s. 52, you have to use both the English and French versions of the Constitution Act, 1982, they are both authoritative and can be combined for BROADER reach. For example, the English s. 52 says “law” that is inconsistent with the Constitution is VOID, but the French version says any “regle de droit” inconsistent with the Constitution is VOID. “Règle de droit” is different from “law” — it is a broader term that encompasses both legislated LAWS and OTHER MEASURES and ACTIONS of government.
You should also consider a jurisdictional attack, and ask yourselves the question, “Is this government?” Are they validly in office? Are they under valid oaths or void oaths? The fact is, election makes the Member, but a valid oath is required to exercise the post, i.e., to sit and vote and govern.
Then there is the issue of whether the elections were valid, so you can ask yourself whether the particular vote was “enlightened” at the time it was made.
In any event, use s. 52 and kick it out yourselves. You can do it. Get some help from 2nd and 3rd-year law students from your local universities, they usually have student law clinics where you can go for some free advice. And just make sure you know who their professors are, and that the professors aren’t kissing federal and provincial you know what.
Check this page out, scroll down to the bottom, to s. 52, there’s a little bit of information on s. 52:
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/charter_digest/index.html
And that’s a nice resource as well re general so-called Charter ‘rights’. I personally don’t ascribe to the Charter, as according to my research [1] Trudeau had no power to add it to the Constitution, nor to ask the UK to add it; and [2] UK had no Constitutional power to add it where the request to add it had no Constitutional basis, either. But that’s another fight. You might like to use it in the meantime (until it’s invalidted).
Regards,
Kathleen Moore
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union
http://habeascorpuscanada.50webs.com
My videos: http://hccvideocatalog.blogspot.com
Blog: http://habeascorpuscanadacomments.blogspot.com
Have a great day in Beautiful B.C.!
December 16th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
It doesnt matter how many websites we create or how many facebook groups we subscribe, we need a BIG RALLY, like in the US and rest of the world, lets get together different forces and even different parties, all together against this criminal tax, not different small rallies accross the province, we need a big, big rally, the mother of all the rallies, in downtown vancouver, only one day, thousands of people marching, a day that will always be remembered as the rally that stopped not only the city, but the HST…
January 1st, 2010 at 6:37 pm
My god people, read the information on this tax, don’t just subscribe to every oppositional politic trying to get some recognition. HST is a logical and positive step in improving an economy during recession. How can the NDP claim to be against this when they are the ones who want more taxes and spending!
January 2nd, 2010 at 1:02 pm
Actually, most of us have studied the act and are horrified that the Federal and Provincial Governments may get away with such underhanded maneuvers.
If this was such a great and needed tax, they should have brought it to the people instead of sticking it to the people. Obviously they have pulled the wool over some peoples eyes but those of us paying attention are here to say NO!
January 10th, 2010 at 3:15 pm
I, think what people don’t understand, is, Canada’s Constitution,has been made null and void, by Harper. Canadians Civil Rights, have been stripped away from citizens. Democracy and Freedom, is no more, in Canada. Our voices were ignored when we protested the HST. There were, bribes paid by Harper, to force the HST, onto, citizens, with no jobs, who are also losing their homes. Low income families and seniors will, bear the brunt of the HST, and will be forced to become homeless. Any one thinking, we are just listening to, the opposed party’s, think again. I am a senior, living on my own, and it is a reality, that the HST, will cause, low income families and seniors, to be homeless. Where in the hell, do we get the money to pay? the HST, burden will be shifted on to the backs of the very people who don’t have a hope of paying that tax. Some seniors have $1,000 to live on for a month, that won’t even cover Campbells booze bill. Single mothers getting $8.00 an hour, have to depend on the food banks, which are in low supply. Don’t you even think, we are “just, trying to get recognition”. Some of us have, had to sell our cars, some are selling contents of their houses, to pay for hydro and heat, which can run, to over $400 a month, just take that off a pension check, or a single mom, supporting her kids, on $8.00 an hour. What is needed, is for our government, to stop their own corruption, and every government agency and service. That is what rules Canada, corruption and greed.